Comments on: S3 for Digital Downloads http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Bringing a different perspective. Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:15:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: admin http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-69 admin Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:07:59 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-69 The cost for small files is very minimal, we have the downloads for the store hosted there and are only paying <$100 a month. We're considering putting all of the images for iBethel.TV on S3 so Apache gets hit less. For the amount of CPU you save on your main app server, I think the cost of S3 is very reasonable. The cost for small files is very minimal, we have the downloads for the store hosted there and are only paying <$100 a month. We’re considering putting all of the images for iBethel.TV on S3 so Apache gets hit less. For the amount of CPU you save on your main app server, I think the cost of S3 is very reasonable.

]]> By: Richard http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Richard Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:26:47 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-67 How are you finding the cost of S3? I am considering it for storing images and maybe even js/css files... What do you reckon? How are you finding the cost of S3? I am considering it for storing images and maybe even js/css files…

What do you reckon?

]]> By: Seth Davis http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Seth Davis Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:30:41 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-19 Definitely! And, if you're in the Washington state area it's probably about as good as a CDN ;) Definitely! And, if you’re in the Washington state area it’s probably about as good as a CDN ;)

]]> By: Chris Gratigny http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Chris Gratigny Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:01:39 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-18 er, oops. at least "mmmm cloud" doesn't say specifically that it is a CDN. I just like that it isn't on one server in one place that I have to worry about. at least I don't think I do. er, oops. at least “mmmm cloud” doesn’t say specifically that it is a CDN. I just like that it isn’t on one server in one place that I have to worry about. at least I don’t think I do.

]]> By: Seth Davis http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Seth Davis Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:53:18 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-17 S3 is not a CDN. That's why AWS has started offering CloudFront. S3 is not a CDN. That’s why AWS has started offering CloudFront.

]]> By: Jason http://www.chrisgratigny.com/2009/09/12/s3-for-digital-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Jason Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:48:55 +0000 http://www.chrisgratigny.com/?p=290#comment-16 nice write-up :) nice write-up :)

]]>